![badan pusat statistik 2014 lampung tebu badan pusat statistik 2014 lampung tebu](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/343428848_EFISIENSI_USAHATANI_TEBU_DI_PROVINSI_GORONTALO_Farm_Efficiency_of_Sugar_Cane_in_Gorontalo_Province/links/5f2997e492851cd302dbf260/largepreview.png)
Last but not least, the data exploration in the fields will be beneficial to give deeper analysis of competitiveness sources and more update data about theįeedlot industry. As it was only rough estimation, the cost might be higher or lower. The expedition cost and government retribution cost along the supply chain.
#Badan pusat statistik 2014 lampung tebu license
Loading-unloading cost, quarantine cost, expedition cost, retribution of abattoir, fuel consumption, import license cost, etc. In general, the distribution cost covers all the payment from port to feedlot and from feedlot to market, i.e. As for capital, life-span estimation of machinery and equipment did not employed in the research due to the missingĪnother issue is related to the distribution cost. Thus, the assessment of medicine cost is the expenditure on medicine per head of cattleīasis and might not reflect the absolute cost. The unit of measurementĪnd information about the kind of each medicine category is unknown. For instance, medicines used are classified into biological, pharmaceutical, and premix. Profitability or divergence becomes imprecise. Moreover, most of the variables in the input and output costs are approached through aggregate measurement. Thus, it might not reveal the true level of competitiveness Period of production while each feedlot could operates in different production frequency for each year. Unknown so it is hard to distinguish whether the comparative and competitive advantage is from the imported or local cattle. The composition of import and local feeder for each feedlot is
![badan pusat statistik 2014 lampung tebu badan pusat statistik 2014 lampung tebu](https://www.etalaseinfo.co.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/whatsapp_image_2021-11-10_at_14.38.34_1-880x528.jpg)
Regional policy which may also affect industry’s comparative and competitive advantage. Reasons is that the other 30 provinces may have allocate their resource for another commodity, each feedlot has different production efficiency, or having a different The exchange rate change gave a little impact to the comparativeĪdvantage of the industry, as long as the domestic component is dominating production activity.ĭespite covering three key area of beef industry, this study could not be generalized as a whole of Indonesian feedlots competitiveness. Program of which they can utilize cheaper feed cost from by-product.Ĥ.
![badan pusat statistik 2014 lampung tebu badan pusat statistik 2014 lampung tebu](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/2017-170814032706-thumbnail-4.jpg)
Thus, government could help the feedlots through establishing partnership Industrial by product will help to reduce this expense. Feedlots used a huge amount of high cost concentrate. Feedlots in West Java spent the largest feed cost among all whichĪffecting their overall profitability. They are benefited with low domestic factor cost such as land, building, machinery, and feeder cattle. The unit of investment spent to feedlot industry in Lampung give greater benefit than in Banten and